Uwe Gradenegger - Page 52 - Uwe Gradenegger

When installing a new certificate authority certificate, you get the error message "The revocation function was unable to check revocation for the certificate. 0x80092012 (-2146885614 CRYPT_E_NO_REVOCATION_CHECK)".

Assume the following scenario:

One installs a new certification authority certificate on the certification authority, either because the certification authority was newly installed, or because the certification authority certificate was renewed.
The certification authority certificate was issued by a higher-level certification authority.
During the installation you get the following error message:

Cannot verify certificate chain. Do you wish to ignore the error and continue? The revocation function was unable to check revocation for the certificate. 0x80092012 (-2146885614 CRYPT_E_NO_REVOCATION_CHECK)

Publishing a certificate revocation list (CRL) fails with the error message "Insufficient access rights to perform the operation. 0x80072098 (WIN32: 8344 ERROR_DS_INSUFF_ACCESS_RIGHTS)".

Assume the following scenario:

An attempt is made to publish a new certificate revocation list (CRL) on a certification authority
The certificate authority is configured to publish the certificate revocation lists to Active Directory (LDAP CDP).
Publishing the certificate revocation list fails with the following error message:

Insufficient access rights to perform the operation. 0x80072098 (WIN32: 8344 ERROR_DS_INSUFF_ACCESS_RIGHTS)

Publishing a certificate revocation list (CRL) fails with the error message "Directory object not found. 0x8007208d (WIN32: 8333 ERROR_DS_OBJ_NOT_FOUND)".

Assume the following scenario:

An attempt is made to publish a new certificate revocation list (CRL) on a certification authority.
The certificate authority is configured to publish the certificate revocation lists to Active Directory (LDAP CDP).
Publishing the certificate revocation list fails with the following error message:

Directory object not found. 0x8007208d (WIN32: 8333 ERROR_DS_OBJ_NOT_FOUND)

Domain controller does not check extended key usage on smart card login

Anyone who wants to use the smartcard logon function in their company would be well advised to ensure that their certification authority has the strongest possible security hardening. This includes some essential measures:

Removing all unnecessary certification authority certificates from the NTAuthCertificates object in Active Directory: Each certification authority located in this store is authorized to issue smartcard logon certificates in Active Directory for the complete forest.
Use qualified subordinationRestricting the certification authority certificates so that they are only trusted for the extended key usages actually issued. In the event of a compromise of the certification authority, the damage is then limited to these extended key usages. The "Smart Card Logon" Extended Key Usage would then only be present in the certification authority certificate of the certification authority that actually issues such certificates.

What is interesting about these thoughts, however, is that the domain controllers do not check the extended key usages at all when logging in via smartcard.

Active Directory forest compromised by EDITF_ATTRIBUTESUBJECTALTNAME2 flag

In net circulate unfortunately much at many Instructions (also the big players are not excluded from this, not even Microsoft itself or the Grand Master Komar), which fatally recommends that the EDITF_ATTRIBUTESUBJECTALTNAME2 flag should be set on the certification authority - supposedly to be able to issue Subject Alternative Name (SAN) extension certificates for manually submitted certificate requests.

Unfortunately, this approach is not only unnecessary, it also has some unpleasant side effects, which in the worst case can help an attacker to take over the entire Active Directory forest.

What requirements must be met on the infrastructure side for smartcard logins to be possible?

In order for a smart card login to be successful, some requirements must be met in the Active Directory environment:

Removing ADCS-specific extensions from certificates

When using Active Directory Certificates, it is noticeable that there are certain extensions in the certificates of the certification authorities and the certificates they issue that are not defined in the relevant RFCs and are specific to AD CS.

Firewall rules required for Active Directory Certificate Services

Implementing an Active Directory integrated certification authority often requires planning the firewall rules to be created on the network. The following is a list of the required firewall rules and any pitfalls.

Description of the EDITF_ADDOLDKEYUSAGE flag

When installing a subordinate certificate authority, you may encounter the following behavior:

One requests a Key Usage extension that is marked as critical, for example, or does not include DigitalSignature.
However, the certificate issued by the parent certificate authority includes DigitalSignature, and the Key Usage extension is marked as non-critical.
The parent certification authority is a standalone certification authority, i.e. without Active Directory integration.

Installing Remote Server Administration Tools for Active Directory Certificate Services on Windows 10 version 1809 and later

Since Windows 10 version 1809, the remote server management tools can no longer be found as a standalone download, but are part of Features on Demand.

How secure is the "Allow private key to be exported" setting in the certificate templates?

PKI administrators often assume that the option in the certificate template to not allow the private key for export is mandatory.

Importing a certificate into a smart card

Sometimes it is necessary to import a certificate that uses a software key into a smart card.

Role configuration for Network Device Enrollment Service (NDES) fails with error message "The RPC server is unavailable. 0x800706ba (WIN32: 1722 RPC_S_SERVER_UNAVAILABLE)".

Assume the following scenario:

One installs a Network Device Enrollment Service (NDES) server
One has the necessary permissions to install the role (local administrator, enterprise administrator)
The role configuration fails with the following error message:

The RPC server is unavailable. 0x800706ba (WIN32: 1722 RPC_S_SERVER_UNAVAILABLE)

Requesting certificates via Certificate Enrollment Web Services fails with error message "Error: The remote endpoint is unable to process the request due to being overloaded. 0x803d0012 (-2143485934 WS_E_ENDPOINT_TOO_BUSY)".

Assume the following scenario:

A user requests a certificate.
An enrollment policy is configured for this, which points to a Certificate Enrollment Policy Web Service (CEP).
The connection to the CEP fails and the user receives the following error message:

Error: The remote endpoint is unable to process the request due to being overloaded. 0x803d0012 (-2143485934 WS_E_ENDPOINT_TOO_BUSY)

Requesting certificates via Certificate Enrollment Web Services fails with error message "Error: A message containing a fault was received from the remote endpoint. 0x803d0013 (-2143485933 WS_E_ENDPOINT_FAULT_RECEIVED)".

Assume the following scenario:

A user requests a certificate.
An enrollment policy is configured for this, which points to a Certificate Enrollment Policy Web Service (CEP).
Authentication is done via Kerberos.
The application for the certificate is made by the CEP server itself.
The connection to the CEP fails and the user receives the following error message:

Error: A message containing a fault was received from the remote endpoint. 0x803d0013 (-2143485933 WS_E_ENDPOINT_FAULT_RECEIVED)